Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Conor Niland vs Thomas Muster Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Niland vs Muster analysis and find out who is favored!
Conor Niland vs Thomas Muster Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Niland 1 - 0 Muster
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niland has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Muster has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niland, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Muster has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niland has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Muster has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niland has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Muster winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niland has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 87/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 11/ 12). Muster has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 437/ 152), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Niland winning 1 times and Muster being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Niland winning 2 and Muster winning 0. The last match between Niland and Muster was at the Braunschweig Challenger, 29-06-2010, First, Clay with Conor Niland getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niland and Muster have played a deciding set 0 times, with Niland winning 0 times and Muster 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Niland winning 0, and Muster 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niland has played against opponents with an average rank of while Muster has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niland has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Muster has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niland has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Muster has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
129
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
6
High
56
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
56% (268-207)
Career Total W/L
68% (640-304)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$56,485
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Conor Niland vs Thomas Muster For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Niland VS Muster
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Conor Niland | Thomas Muster |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (36/50) | 51% (30/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (30/36) | 53% (16/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (4/14) | 31% (9/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (34/59) | 32% (16/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Conor Niland
Player
Thomas Muster
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Conor Niland | Thomas Muster |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Conor Niland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 2-6 6-1 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuki Bhambri
Player
Conor Niland
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Conor Niland
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-1 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 6-7(3) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Conor Niland
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
80)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Conor Niland
Player
Dorian Descloix
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stephane Bohli
Player
Conor Niland
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Muster Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Bloemke
Player
Thomas Muster
51%
(
47 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Thomas Muster
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessio di Mauro
Player
Thomas Muster
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Fischer
Player
Thomas Muster
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
6-0 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Muster
Player
Leonardo Mayer
42%
(
37 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
65%
(
34 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Thomas Muster
40%
(
19 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Balleret
Player
Thomas Muster
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Player
Thomas Muster
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Thomas Muster
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
44%
(
46 of
104)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Niland Vs Muster Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Niland are available here and Muster photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
